<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Flickr cracking down on professional photographers?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nickpotter.net/archive/2008/08/flickr-cracking-down-on-professional-photographers/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nickpotter.net/archive/2008/08/flickr-cracking-down-on-professional-photographers</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 25 Jul 2010 14:38:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: publicenergy</title>
		<link>http://www.nickpotter.net/archive/2008/08/flickr-cracking-down-on-professional-photographers#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>publicenergy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2008 00:58:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nickpotter.net/npwp/http:/nickpotter.net/npwp/2009/04/sample-post#comment-7</guid>
		<description>That policy has always been in place - from discussions that took place in the groups a year or two ago, it seems that your profile is the place to put any links in to photo sales and photo pages should remain a commercial free zone.
The only difference now is that some of the images may be for sale through Getty which would beg the question, well if it&#039;s good enough for Flickr/Getty, it should be good enough for me.
Personally I&#039;d like to see a field per photo so that I could provide a link for each photo and a &#039;buy&#039; link would appear in a low key way (like the print button). It would be much tidier than people putting their own links in and heaven-forbid - banners.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That policy has always been in place &#8211; from discussions that took place in the groups a year or two ago, it seems that your profile is the place to put any links in to photo sales and photo pages should remain a commercial free zone.<br />
The only difference now is that some of the images may be for sale through Getty which would beg the question, well if it&#8217;s good enough for Flickr/Getty, it should be good enough for me.<br />
Personally I&#8217;d like to see a field per photo so that I could provide a link for each photo and a &#8216;buy&#8217; link would appear in a low key way (like the print button). It would be much tidier than people putting their own links in and heaven-forbid &#8211; banners.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
