<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: National Trust Photography Issues</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nickpotter.net/archive/2009/04/national-trust-photography-issues/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nickpotter.net/archive/2009/04/national-trust-photography-issues</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 25 Jul 2010 14:38:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Wild</title>
		<link>http://www.nickpotter.net/archive/2009/04/national-trust-photography-issues#comment-37</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Wild</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 09:54:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nickpotter.net/?p=337#comment-37</guid>
		<description>I wish the National Trust would lighten up about photography. I would have thought that the more photos of their places there are out and about, the more likely it is that extra visitors will come and spend money or join the Trust.

I guess they must make enough out of their photography arm to make that more of a focus than using photos to attract extra visitors though really.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wish the National Trust would lighten up about photography. I would have thought that the more photos of their places there are out and about, the more likely it is that extra visitors will come and spend money or join the Trust.</p>
<p>I guess they must make enough out of their photography arm to make that more of a focus than using photos to attract extra visitors though really.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
